Introduction
IFAD COSOP 2001
The COSOP for Rwanda approved in July 2001 by IFAD,
reflects IFAD and Regional strategies, the evolving circumstances
in Rwanda, the lessons of project implementation experience, and
the important changes introduced to the country’s institutional
setting. The overall aim of IFAD is to comply, as much as possible
within the constraints of the Fund limited resources, with the Government’s
request that IFAD takes the lead in supporting Government efforts
to alleviate rural poverty. This would entail investing resources
in projects focusing on sustainable activities that respond to the
felt needs of the target group, developing and testing approaches
that can be replicated in other parts of the country with the support
of other Donors, promoting co-financing of own projects by other
Donors, and maintaining an effective policy dialogue with the Government
on matters related to the economic, human and institutional development
of the poor rural community in Rwanda.
In pursuing its overall aims, IFAD is guided by three basic strategic
guidelines:
-
Emphasis on institutional development to
achieve the effective transition of project approaches to local
communities from the concept of helping project “beneficiaries”
to that of dealing with “partners in development”;
-
Exploiting all potential means
of increasing the income of the rural poor, including food and
cash crops, livestock, and non-farm income generating activities;
-
Focus on the potential synergies
between IFAD projects, undertaking a smaller number
of projects covering a smaller area with complementary activities,
and correspondingly increase the support of IFAD Headquarters
to project start-up and implementation.
Accordingly, the COSOP indicates the following
nine main thrusts of IFAD strategy in Rwanda: (i) support to the
government decentralization policy, (ii) support to the development
of sustainable rural microfinance institutions, (iii) support to
new ways to handle issues in technology generation and transfer
for crop and livestock, (iv) support to income generation, income
diversification, and market organization, (v) integrated support
to small and medium size non-farming rural enterprises, (vi) support
to community infrastructure, (vii) cross cutting emphasis on gender
and on fighting impact of HIV/AIDS, (viii) decentralized project
management and improved reporting monitoring and impact evaluation
practices and, (ix) improved exploitation of potential synergies
among different IFAD projects, and more exchange of experiences
among IFAD projects and with other Donors’ initiatives with
similar objectives.
Emphasis will be given in the reformulated tea
component of the PDCRE on three of the above-mentioned thrusts,
namely: (a) support to new ways to handle issues in technology generation
and transfer for crop and livestock, (b) support to income generation,
and income diversification and, (c) support to community infrastructure.
|